Image for post
Image for post

Avoiding Social Influence and Conformity in Online Communities

Social influence is a strong natural force. As social beings we seek to fit in and belong amongst our peers in day-to-day life. This instinctual desire can often lead to different forms of social influence, including conformity, whereby we find ourselves matching the behaviours of group norms. How can we seek to avoid the powerful social influence within online research communities?

Why are we socially influenced?

As social beings we seek to fit in and belong amongst our peers. This instinctual desire can often lead to forms of social influence, including conformity. So how do we avoid this to gain valuable data?

Factors which can influence conformity

Size matters

Online communities often have thousands of members, within which are usually divided into smaller groups within forum discussions, focus groups, etc.

Conformity amongst community members can be influenced by the group size they find themselves in. For example, a member may feel more comfortable expressing their own unbiased opinions in a forum discussion involving 50+ members, rather than a smaller focus group of 5 members. It’s important to consider group size within your community activities as a key factor in conformity.

It’s not what you know, it’s who you know

How is this relevant to online communities? Well, online communities bring strangers together from across all walks of life and cultures, dispersed from around the world — the vast majority of the time, members don’t know each other when they first join an online community, a perfect opportunity to eliminate the bias of preformed conceptions, judgements, friendships and relationships whether positive or negative (unless in coincidence, or if they have been able to invite their friend to join and take part). It’s exciting that friendships form over time in online communities, but still I don’t think this is a huge contributing factor to conformity within them. This is a good thing rather than bad!

The opinion behind the screen

Being in the comfort of your own home puts you at ease straight away. Being confronted face to face with strangers can be daunting for many people. This fear factor could increase conformity, a desire to feel included with the opinion of the group of strangers and feel more ‘liked’ which makes online communities great for encouraging the voice behind the keyboard.

Here are just some examples of conformity that I have come across in my own experience of online communities:

  1. A member clicks onto an online discussion, to find that other members have already given their opinions and answers. Whether conscious or not, these opinions being visible can influence the opinion/answer that the end up posting as an end result. But is it always a bad thing that their ideas have been provoked? It may actually help them to provide more ideas and detail!
  2. During some online activities, like live focus groups, the pressure of having to respond instantly can lead some members to copy other opinions instead of forming their own. I.e., they may simply comment ‘I agree with ____’ and whilst sometimes ‘I agree’ may be valid and plausible, it’s always important to capture opinions first hand and written out in full, to capture all the detail and tone behind it.

How to avoid social influence and conformity in online communities

Settings in the right setting

For instance, you can opt for members’ answers to be visible to the whole group from the beginning, which would be useful in most situations where you wish for openness and members being able to read through the discussion first, to observe and then compose their own answer. If this makes you think ‘copying’ and ‘bias’ you can opt for members’ answers to only be visible to other members once they have commented themselves. This format is commonly used and offers honest, unbiased opinions whilst still promoting interaction between members.

Moderation in moderation

One to one

Sometimes prompting individuals privately so they don’t have the conscious desire to conform if other members see their responses is a great thing to do. It means that they can take part in the main discussion whilst having a one on one discussion with the moderator at the same time. This is supported by research by Burger et al. (2001) when participants were allowed to answer in private (so the rest of the group does not know their response) conformity decreases. This is because there are fewer group pressures and normative influence is not as powerful, as there is no fear of rejection from the group.)

Despite the stubborn prevalence of peer pressure, there are a number of techniques that researchers can employ to reduce the pressure of social conformity within online research communities:

For some research needs, surveys and polls may be better suited if you really do not want the element of conformity to hinder your results. Members answer on their own accord without the element of social influence (or to a lesser degree at least) without being able to change/edit their answers based on other people’s as well.

Having said this, group discussions promote free, spontaneous interactions and encourage members to come together. Consider the aims/brief and evaluate this carefully.


Where I think we cannot completely eradicate social influence in online communities, because we are sensitised with likes of other social platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram — the recommendation’s I have given in this blog will for sure help to minimise it cropping up with good practice and effective moderation.

The original version of this article appeared on the FlexMR Insight Blog and can be accessed here.

Written by

We empower brands to inform every decision at the speed of business by delivering on-demand insight and enterprise grade research technology.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store